Visa and Mastercard agree to $167.5 million settlement over independent ATM fees

,
 September 17, 2026

Visa and Mastercard will pay a combined $167.5 million to settle claims they drove up the fees cardholders paid at independent ATMs, and anyone hit with those charges over nearly two decades may be eligible.

The two payment giants agreed to the settlement after cardholders accused them of using their operating rules to fix prices at independent ATMs, the privately owned machines found in convenience stores, gas stations, bars, and hotel lobbies across the country. The lawsuit alleges those rules violated federal and state antitrust laws, forcing customers to pay inflated access fees every time they pulled cash from a non-bank machine.

Both Visa and Mastercard have denied any wrongdoing. They agreed to pay anyway.

Visa picks up the bigger tab at nearly $89 million

Under the terms of the settlement, Visa will pay $88,775,000 and Mastercard will pay $78,725,000. The combined $167.5 million fund will be divided among eligible claimants based on the number of qualifying surcharged transactions each person submits, the New York Post reported.

The eligibility window stretches back nearly two decades. Cardholders who were charged an access fee at an independent ATM between October 24, 2007, and August 14, 2026, may qualify, provided their bank did not fully reimburse the fee.

That is a wide net. Millions of Americans have used independent ATMs over that span, and the surcharges, often $2.50, $3.00, or more per transaction, are among the most common consumer gripes in everyday banking. The plaintiffs' core argument is straightforward: Visa and Mastercard's rules amounted to price fixing that kept those fees artificially high, and cardholders absorbed the cost.

Claims must be filed by February 2027

Anyone who believes they qualify can file a claim online or by mail. The deadline is February 10, 2027. A court hearing is scheduled one week later, on February 17, 2027, to decide whether to approve the settlement.

If the court signs off, payments are expected to go out within six months. The money will be distributed digitally, sent to claimants by email.

The settlement also carves out separate statewide classes for cardholders in California, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Michigan, though the details of how those state-level classes affect individual payouts remain unclear from the available filings.

Key questions the settlement leaves unanswered

Several practical details remain unresolved. The settlement does not specify what the net payout will be after attorneys' fees and administrative costs are deducted, a standard haircut in class action cases that often leaves individual claimants with far less than the headline number suggests. No estimate of per-claimant payouts has been disclosed.

The court overseeing the case has not been publicly identified in the reporting, and the named plaintiffs behind the lawsuit have not been disclosed. The specific antitrust statutes cited in the complaint, beyond the general reference to "federal and state antitrust laws", are also unspecified.

Nor is it clear how Visa and Mastercard's operating rules allegedly functioned as a price-fixing mechanism. The companies denied wrongdoing, and the settlement, like most class action deals, resolves the dispute without any admission of fault.

A familiar pattern for consumers

Class action settlements of this size sound impressive in a headline. A $167.5 million fund is real money. But the math changes fast once it is divided among potentially millions of eligible transactions filed over an 18-year window, then reduced by legal fees that routinely consume a third or more of the total.

Cardholders who file may receive a modest digital payment months from now. Those who do nothing, as most class members historically do, will receive nothing at all. The February 2027 deadline gives eligible consumers more than enough time to act, but only if they know the settlement exists.

For Visa and Mastercard, the payout amounts to a rounding error on their combined annual revenues. The companies walk away without admitting they did anything wrong, and the ATM fee structure that prompted the lawsuit remains largely intact.

Consumers got charged for years. The lawyers will get paid. And the companies that denied wrongdoing wrote a check to make it all go away, which tells you everything about who the system is built to protect.

About Jack Newsome

Become Wealthier... 
In Just 5 Minutes Per Day

Subscribe to Capital Digest and get fast, actionable insights on markets, money, and opportunity — straight to your inbox.