Wildomar, California fines grocery stores $100 per abandoned shopping cart under new ordinance

,
 September 11, 2026

A small Southern California city voted unanimously to start fining grocery stores for every shopping cart found abandoned on public streets, the latest sign that California towns are fed up footing the bill for a problem retailers created.

Wildomar's city council passed the ordinance 5-0, imposing a $100 penalty on businesses each time one of their carts turns up outside a shopping center on a public right of way. The suburb of roughly 37,000 people, about ninety minutes east of Los Angeles and adjacent to Lake Elsinore, acted after residents filed repeated complaints about stray carts blocking sidewalks, clogging drainage systems, and creating hazards for drivers and pedestrians, the New York Post reported.

Albertsons and Barons Market are among the businesses in Wildomar now subject to the fines. Neither company has publicly responded to the new rules.

The ordinance also sets strict limits on where carts can be staged outside shopping centers, a measure aimed at keeping the problem from spreading to adjacent streets and sidewalks in the first place. Enforcement details, including who retrieves the carts and who writes the ticket, were not specified in available reporting.

Wildomar joins a growing list of California cities billing retailers for stray carts

Wildomar is not acting alone. Across the state, cities large and small have started shifting the cost of abandoned carts back onto the stores that own them.

Eureka, on California's northern coast, passed its own rule last year charging businesses $80 every time city employees haul a cart back to a store. Big-box retailers Walmart and Target are among the companies reportedly being billed under that program.

Brawley, a small city in Imperial County near the Mexican border, unanimously approved a similar ordinance around the same time. Brawley Police Chief Jimmy Duran made the case plainly when the measure passed:

"They become potential health hazards and really interfere with some of the pedestrian and vehicular traffic within our city."

Duarte, Glendale, and Fortuna have also taken action on shopping cart problems, though the specifics of their measures were not detailed. The pattern is clear: cities that once quietly absorbed the cleanup costs are done subsidizing corporate negligence.

The trend is not limited to California. Pueblo, Colorado recently began charging retailers up to $95 per abandoned cart, reflecting a nationwide shift in how municipalities handle the issue.

Sacramento eliminated a three-day rule that slowed cart retrieval

Local ordinances got a boost from the state legislature. A bill sponsored by state Sen. Dave Cortese, a Democrat representing Silicon Valley, passed last year and eliminated an old requirement that forced city workers to wait three full days before returning an abandoned cart to its owner. Under the new law, workers can haul a stray cart back to the retailer immediately.

Cortese called the prior waiting period an "outdated" law. In a statement, he laid out the case for faster action:

"Abandoned shopping carts are more than just an eyesore, they create safety hazards, block sidewalks, pollute our creeks, and cost cities time and taxpayer money to clean up."

New state guidance now allows towns and cities to fine businesses up to $100 per retrieved cart, the ceiling Wildomar adopted. The precise source of that guidance, whether it flows directly from the Cortese bill or from a separate regulatory action, was not specified.

While cities grapple with the low-tech problem of runaway carts, some retailers are investing in high-tech solutions. Kroger and Wegmans have rolled out AI-powered carts that track purchases in real time, though those innovations are designed to boost sales, not prevent carts from wandering off store property.

Retailers stay quiet while taxpayers pick up the tab

The silence from the grocery industry is notable. Neither Albertsons nor Barons Market has commented on Wildomar's ordinance. Walmart and Target have not publicly addressed Eureka's billing program. The stores own the carts. The carts end up in gutters, on sidewalks, and in drainage channels. And until now, taxpayers covered the cost of cleaning up the mess.

A $100 fine may sound modest, but it adds up when a city is collecting dozens of carts a month. The real leverage is reputational: no grocery chain wants to be publicly identified as the source of a neighborhood blight problem. Wildomar's 5-0 vote suggests the council heard enough from residents to act without a single dissent.

Other retailers have faced scrutiny over cart-related issues that go beyond abandonment. Publix drew complaints from Florida seniors over oversized cart designs that created accessibility problems inside stores, a reminder that the humble shopping cart creates friction well beyond the parking lot.

Some chains have explored technological fixes. ShopRite recently deployed smart carts at its Staten Island locations, part of a broader push toward digitally connected retail. Whether any of these innovations will address the basic problem of carts leaving store property remains an open question.

Open questions Wildomar has not yet answered

Several practical details remain unclear. The ordinance does not appear to specify whether fines are assessed per cart or per incident, a distinction that could dramatically change the financial exposure for a store like Albertsons with high cart volume. The enforcement mechanism, who spots the carts, who retrieves them, who pens the citation, has not been publicly explained.

It is also unclear whether the ordinance includes an appeals process for businesses or a grace period for compliance. Retailers may argue they cannot control what customers do with carts after leaving the store. But the council's unanimous vote suggests Wildomar's elected officials believe the stores bear responsibility for keeping their property on their property.

And that gets to the core principle. A shopping cart belongs to the business that bought it. When it ends up blocking a sidewalk or plugging a storm drain, the cost of retrieval should not fall on the resident who tripped over it or the city crew that hauled it away. Wildomar's ordinance is a small-dollar measure, but it applies a straightforward conservative idea: if you own it, you are responsible for it.

When cities stop asking politely and start sending invoices, accountability has a way of following the money right back to the people who should have handled the problem in the first place.

About Alex Tanzer

Become Wealthier... 
In Just 5 Minutes Per Day

Subscribe to Capital Digest and get fast, actionable insights on markets, money, and opportunity — straight to your inbox.